Stand Up for Science backs Fauci after Senate hearing
Stand Up for Science is pushing back on Dr. Anthony Fauci's July 29 congressional hearing on the origins of COVID-19, calling it a distraction from current public health threats. The group's response underscores growing tension over how Congress should handle pandemic-era science and the role of career experts.
Why it matters: - Stand Up for Science says Congress is wasting time on a hearing that could chill future scientific advice from career experts. - The group argues lawmakers should focus on current outbreaks, including more than 13,000 cases of measles, cyclospora and screwworm in the U.S. - The reaction adds to the broader fight over how the U.S. evaluates pandemic response and scientific decision-making.
What happened: - Stand Up for Science responded on July 30, 2026, to Dr. Anthony Fauci's July 29 congressional hearing on COVID-19 origins. - Members of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Accountability questioned Fauci during the hearing. - Dr. Colette Delawalla, founder and CEO of Stand Up for Science, criticized the hearing as a "trial" aimed at discrediting Fauci.
The details: - Delawalla said public health officials and elected representatives should be addressing the current outbreak count instead of focusing on Fauci. - Delawalla warned the hearing could set a dangerous precedent for other career subject matter experts who may serve in advisory or decision-making roles. - Delawalla also said the hearing could signal consequences for scientists whose findings conflict with an administration's beliefs or ideology. - Stand Up for Science said it continues to support Fauci and his evidence-based public health leadership during decades of service. - Delawalla is available for comment.
Between the lines: - The response frames the hearing as part of a larger struggle over whether scientific experts should face political scrutiny for guidance given during a novel pandemic. - Stand Up for Science is positioning itself as a defender of independent science and against what it sees as politicized attacks on public health officials. - The group's comments suggest concern that future experts may hesitate to give candid advice if they fear public hearings or political retaliation.
What's next: - Stand Up for Science is likely to keep using Fauci's hearing to argue for stronger support for scientific expertise in government. - The group's broader advocacy work suggests it will continue pressing Congress and federal agencies on science policy and public health leadership. - Learn more about Stand Up for Science
Disclaimer: This article was produced by AGP Wire with the assistance of artificial intelligence based on original source content and has been refined to improve clarity, structure, and readability. This content is provided on an “as is” basis. While care has been taken in its preparation, it may contain inaccuracies or omissions, and readers should consult the original source and independently verify key information where appropriate. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, investment, or other professional advice.
Sign up for:
Global Politics Reporter
The daily local news briefing you can trust. Every day. Subscribe now.
Check Your Email!
We sent a one-time activation link to: .
Confirm it's you by clicking the email link.
If the email is not in your inbox, check spam or try again.
Welcome back!
is already signed up. Check your inbox for updates.